On October 6, 1980, a 34-year-old Donald Trump gave an interview with Rona Barrett where they touched on a wide range of topics from his marriage, business relationships, construction, as well as his future aspirations. This is one of few interviews I have ever seen with Donald Trump where I felt like the interviewer had no agenda. Rona was simply making polite inquiries into Donald’s thoughts on various topics. In return, Mr. Trump was providing well-articulated and equally polite responses. It just felt like two people talking. Her first question, while somewhat straightforward was also profound given the circumstances that would play themselves out some 35 years later. She simply asked, “You are a mover, you are a doer. If you were going to make America perfect, how would you do it?” Donald responds by saying, “Well I think that America is a country that has tremendous, tremendous, potential. I think that much like the mind, America is using very very little of it potential. I feel that with the proper leadership this country can go on to become what it once was”. He went on to discuss that respect is key to everything and that if we don’t demand respect from other countries then some of them will eventually take advantage of that fact but if we demand respect as a country, it will keep those type of behaviors in check. So even some 3 ½ decades prior to his own presidential run he understood the nuances of political respect were not all that different from the demand for respect in the business world.
Again, that was October of 1980 which was just one month from a very important presidential election.
About 3 weeks after that interview with Rona Barrett, Donald Trump like many Americans observed with great joy what was perhaps the greatest debate takedown of any incumbent president in US history when Ronald Wilson Reagan completely dismantled a lifeless and aimless Jimmy Carter. In rewatching this debate I was reminded just how balanced the questioning and coverage used to be. It wasn’t completed impartial but nothing at all compared to what we see now. The first question right out of the gate, Marvin Stone with US News and World asked then Governor Reagan the following question: “Governor, as you’re well aware the question of war and peace has emerged as a central issue in this campaign and in the give and take in recent weeks President Carter has been criticized for responding late to aggressive Soviet impulses, for insufficient buildup of our armed forces, and paralysis in dealing with Afghanistan and Iran. You have been criticized for being all too quick to advocate the use of lots of muscle, military action to deal with foreign crisis. Specifically, what are the difference between the two of you in the uses of American military power?” In response Reagans says, “I don’t know what the difference might be because I don’t really know what Mr. Carter’s policies are.” It took the masterful Reagan precisely one topic to echo what pretty much every American had been questioning for 4 years which is ‘what in the world has Carter been doing’? Inflation was absurdly high (for the time), multiple foreign adversaries were at our doorstep, and the political winds were fiercely in favor of the Americans wanting change. With just 7 days until the election, that debate ended any hope that Carter may have had for a second term. In fact, the outcome was so obvious that the very thought of a Reagan administration caused the United States and Iranian officials to sign an agreement to release 52 American hostages on January 19th, 1981 after 14 months of captivity. The next day Reagan amassed a staggering 489 electoral votes becoming the 40th POTUS. He obviously won California, but he also won states like New York, Maine, Vermont, Illinois, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Delaware, and many states that no Republican could even dream of winning today. 1984 came and Reagan was re-elected with a ridiculous 538 electoral votes. It was an 8-year span so dominate that we may never witness it again.
Just a few months into his first term, Reagan was shot in the chest outside a Washington, D.C., hotel by John Hinckley Jr. Two police officers and Press Secretary James Brady are also wounded. What was disturbing about Hinckley that the press choose to ignore is that Hinckley trailed President Jimmy Carter from state to state, and was arrested in Nashville, Tennessee, on a firearms charge. He returned home and despite psychiatric treatment for depression, his mental health did not improve. He began to target the newly elected president Ronald Reagan in 1981. For this purpose, he collected material on the assassination of John F. Kennedy. And yet, he was able to nearly assassinate a sitting Republican president in broad daylight. Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity but was institutionalized. Before the Hinckley case, the insanity defense had been used in less than 2% of all felony cases and was unsuccessful in almost 75% of those trials. Public outcry over the verdict led to the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984, which altered the rules for consideration of mental illness of defendants in federal criminal court proceedings.
However, this doesn’t change the fact that he (now a musician) with both a YouTube channel and Twitter account will be released in June and soon thereafter be playing sold out shows in New York City, Chicago, and other places, I am sure. So, in a country gone completely mad it’s perfectly fine to pursue a music career after an unsuccessful assassination attempt on a sitting president, however, protesting an election and being essentially guided up the stairs and through the halls of a Capitol building by security guards means you will be placed in a DC jail for over a year with no trial.
With each passing generation the idea of space has witnessed a metamorphosis of sorts. While the enterprise of attempting to merge Hollywood movies with some level of reality has always been a thing the gap has been so great that it never really went past the idea of fun fiction. In the late 70s and early 80s there was always the sense that Spock and Luke Skywalker existed in galaxies far, far away. It wasn’t really until the mid to late 90s that the idea of human/space interactions became a concept that had at least a little feasibility attached to it. Fast forward 20-30 years and all bets are off. Hollywood, government, and now the private sector is in hot pursuit of ‘Contact’.
The geo-political space almost completely mirrors what we have witnessed in terms of the perception of science fiction vs what is truly attainable.
This of course, was first pursued in earnest by the Kennedy administration. Some may remember the now famous promise by JFK that Americans would walk on the moon before 10 years had passed. He wanted to announce a program that the U.S. had a strong chance at achieving before the Soviet Union. After consulting with Vice President Johnson, NASA Administrator James Webb, and other officials, he concluded that landing an American on the Moon would be a very challenging technological feat, but an area of space exploration in which the U.S. actually had a potential lead. That promise was made in May of 1961 and fulfilled in July of 1969. As part of his intense pursuit of ‘Outer Space Matters’ Kennedy issued National Security Action Memorandum Number 271 whereby he was requesting that NASA work in cooperation with the USSR to better understand both public as well as sensitive data related to space. This memorandum was issued on November 12, 1963. 10 days later on November 22nd President Kennedy was shot and killed Dallas, TX.
Not unlike Kennedy before him, Ronald Reagan had significant aspirations as it relates to Space, and more specifically Space and Russia. SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) also known as Star Wars was to be the crowning jewel in terms of ongoing protection from the USSR. The program was designed to instill a healthy fear into even the staunchest enemies. From a marketing perspective it worked quite well, as it created a narrative that the United States will be taking no prisoners when it comes to the defense of our homeland. The problem with SDI is it was always a solution looking for a plan. While the world had made great strides in infrastructure and technology there was simply no way under the sun that any military had technology potent enough to conduct simultaneous ground and space-based surveillance and tracking with the sophistication to intercept an incoming ballistic missile in real-time. For heavens sake Microsoft DOS wasn’t even released until 1981 and the first internet domain names in 1985. These goals were never attainable, and no amount of funding was going to change that fact. Reagan knew the threat alone was enough to keep the enemy at bay. I am sure Trump has learned many things from observing Reagan and one of them is its key to win the perception war first and foremost.
The window of time between the Reagan and Trump administrations is nearly 30 years and between Kennedy and Trump is over 60 years so it goes without saying the growth in technology has been monumental. But the actual advancement in technology is not nearly as important as the leverage that can potentially be used between competing nations.
Recently, Russia has resurfaced claims about things like the need for an investigation into the moon landing and or even more recently a military leader saying that the US doesn’t have any legitimate space program. But there is some interesting about the flavor of these comments because with the advancement of Russian technological capabilities they may know quite a bit about 9/11 for example. This is a country that has done their own JFK investigations….so they are holding a lot of cards in terms of how America is perceived in the world and that is a problem because they are starting to play those cards. The most recent key here is the way they have handled the biolabs….because we had the Russian lieutenant general that is essentially in charge of the department of the ministry of defense that handles biowarfare issues. This general gave a full briefing on these biolabs, published the documents, and this was all after the US essentially denied and said out hands are clean of this scenario because we are America, and we don’t do that here. I know this sounds like mocking, but we should be disgusted by this junk. We have been caught red-handed developing bioweapons in a foreign country on the borders of another foreign country that has served notice to us that we don’t want you building bioweapons next to our country. To me, this is another indicator that the Russian gloves are going to come off especially given the current administration. There is all sorts of nifty stuff they could start talking about as I said a moment ago….9/11, JFK, Benghazi, Monsanto foods, Hunter’s laptop….you name it and they probably have it. That is a very dangerous set of facts and here is another problem….inside of Russia, Putin is polling at about 83% which as you know is considerably better than Mr. Biden is polling here. What this means is that anything claimed by Russia is probably going to play relatively well outside of the west…because our friends are dropping like flies.
But the struggle between the US and Russia stems from progressive US leadership that has zero concept of cultural boundaries between countries.
First, Putin is precisely who he presents himself to be which is a Russian orthodox believer and what that means practically is Russia is turning away from this secularized version of globalism that it was under when it was the Soviet Union and it’s turning to traditional cultural roots. This cannot be understood without orthodoxy because there simply isn’t Russia without orthodoxy which was the point from the very beginning. So, Putin thinks in this way so for example, he is not going to be in favor of women feminist musicians or whatever the name of that punk rock band was back in 2012 that staged that protest riot in a church, he is not going to recognizing LGBTQ rights in the same way the west does. Because what you’re dealing with here is a man, in that respect at least, very much like a Stalin that insisted on a very public and traditional morality. And that is what the west really means when they say, ‘Regime Change’, it wants to get rid of that whole move of traditional cultures and install its own progressive secularism. In other words, this is a real clash of culture that we are dealing with here. I have told people before that if you’re eastern orthodox you experience the west as something that hates you and it hates you because it doesn't understand you. It doesn’t understand you because it views you has a Christian civilization that doesn’t follow Christ or likewise a Catholic civilization that is not papal and in the mind of those in the east it hasn’t been for a thousand years. And the reason that Russia and China (strange bedfellows that they may be) can understand each other is because they are traditionalists, and they are about their civilization….and they know this is at odds with current western philosophy. The Confucian mandate was always and still is to this day all about the well-run civilization. So, this is a very traditional way of thinking and we have quite frankly lost that in the west. So, this is what is in Putin’s mind….so when the Russia say the west is not ‘agreement capable’ and the United States in particular and they call us the ‘empire of lies’ they mean it. So, this idea of Russia being the evil empire versus the righteous United States is being flipped on it head. So, I know these are some strong statements but think about it, the very leadership from here that is pushing regime change over there is also suppressing our moral traditions over here. Vladimir Putin isn’t taking God out of our schools and churches. Vladimir Putin isn’t forbidding me to congregate with fellow believers all in the name of virus protection.
So, it’s not America vs. Russia thing. It’s this progressivist thing vs. Christians, Russians, Catholics, Mormons, Muslims, Hindus, or anything that is not progressive and secular.
So, where Trump comes into play is that in 2016 when he came onto the scene something very dramatic happened and they put this progressive machine into overdrive and removed any façade of decency. They went hard core after Trump and everything he represented because it too closely aligned with tradition which was the very thing they were attempting to tamp down. So, all bets were off, and they were throwing everything and the kitchen sink at Trump (including the CIA). You know when guys like John Brennen have their own show on MSNBC then these folks are playing for keeps.
Trump was, in their minds, a catalyst that reared the ugly head of populism when in reality he was doing nothing more than rearing the not-so-ugly head of Patriotism. So, in this sense, he was doing the same thing as Putin which was, to perhaps align with ideas only to the point that they are not in opposition to the country’s traditions that need to be safeguarded. And the same goes for Xi. These are not globalist cut from the same cloth as Christine LeGard or Macron or Trudeau.
So, the JFK, Reagan, Trump, Putin, Xi thread is a very unique one in that even though they have very different visions within their respective countries they have very common interests in maintaining traditions and not bowing to the collective.
But I want to return to the JFK, Reagan, Trump connections and focus on how things are currently playing out and my thoughts on why. One very strong theme is that all three promoted true collaboration while trying to maintain sovereign boundaries.
President Kennedy sought collaboration in matters related to space exploration but the powers that be would never allow that to materialize. This same ‘prescient’ view…. (prescient meaning psychic, prophetic or clairvoyant) was applied to Trumps move to place civilian SpecOps directly underneath the Acting Sec of Defense some 57 years later. Trump, like Kennedy, knows the enemy and it was not Russia.
In the case of Reagan, he denounced a one-world state and used a peace through strength posture with SDI. At this point, most assume that Mikhail Gorbachev has passed away but indeed he is still around and in fact gave two intriguing interviews. One with Swiss Info (SWI) 8 years ago and one in 2019 with the BBC. When asked about Putin in 2014 and his testing of ICBM and his potential willingness to use them here was the response from Gorbachev:
“Putin is being provoked into upholding the arms race or even into stoking it. It’s unavoidable. Many countries have started buying arms, cannons, weapons of mass destruction and so on. The greatest danger of all is from the military industrial complex. Those that are pushing for this have to be restrained. I see how hard it is for Obama. He’s considered a weak president, reluctant to make decisions.” The interviewer from the BBC pursued a similar line of questioning and had to be chastised and reminded that “…there is still only one country that has ever used an atomic weapon and that country is the United States”. So, like Trump, Gorbachev understands that those crying for gun bans and disarmament are the same group pushing for the next world war.
And finally, in the case of Trump he catered not to the deep state but rather worked with Putin to eventually expose what they both knew to be true. Here is an excerpt from statements made by both Putin and Trump during the Helsinki press conference. These are two men that have known for some time that they have a common enemy.
But there is a massive difference between what Trump is dealing with versus his predecessors. Trump is not only dealing with the space that exists in and above the earth’s atmosphere but he’s dealing with the space that exists at our fingertips…..cyberspace. The enemy has used and continues to use both the final frontier and the cyber frontier to keep us and Trump guessing. So, when it appears he’s playing 4-dimensional chess it’s not because he chooses to it’s because he is forced to.
In my issue “More Rubbish from the Crowd That Brought You COVID” I spoke at length about the Colonial Pipeline hack. Here is a portion of what I said…
So, apparently for the first time in US history a major domestic pipeline ceased production operation because of a cyber-attack from……all together now…..RUSSIA. Now the updated historical numbers around causes looks like this.
• 11 Explosions
• 8 Ruptures
• 2 Leaks
• 1 Cyber-attack
A Bloomberg article said, “A cyber-attack has never taken down a U.S. fuel pipeline quite as big as the Colonial Pipeline. It’s the nation’s largest gasoline, diesel and jet fuel system and a critical source of fuel supply for the U.S. Northeast.”
What they meant to say is, “A cyber-attack has never taken down a U.S. fuel pipeline….period.”
Bloomberg flat out lied.
I can tell you with absolutely certainty that these software systems that control oil and gas distribution use security that you and I can’t even fathom which is precisely why they don’t get hacked. Again, I repeat. There has never been a cyberattack in this country that has actually caused a pipeline shutdown....never.
So, either you think some dark web Russia hack team took out a massive pipeline that supplies 45% of the natural gas to the entire east coast of this country or you think like me and know there are no longer coincidences in this country. These monsters have now teed up cyber-attacks as their next COVID without a shred of evidence to support that anything is actually happening. You see they just tell you things like ‘today in the news 3 million Chase customers were compromised because of a cyberattack’ and you’re forced to just buy it because guess what? You can’t prove it didn’t happen. In fact, just within the last 2 weeks CISA is upping the ante in terms of the seriousness of the cyber ‘threat’.
Advanced persistent threat (APT….acronyms make things more believable) actors have exhibited the capability to gain full system access to multiple industrial control systems? This is the kind of junk that is greasing the skids for multiple millions (if not billions) of people to be totally taken for a ride because they simply can’t get their minds around it so they just give over the reins. It’s a trust thing.
• Trust the intelligence community.
• Trust the science.
....and what could be the mother of them all.
• Trust the technology.
Not since they started playing the public cyberattack narrative back in 2003 has a single incident been challenged (at least not to my knowledge). And herein lays the problem. If society on the whole is not educated enough to at least understand the basics of infrastructure and personal cybersecurity, then we are headed for a mass deception that will make COVID look tame by comparison. At least with COVID we had an idea if we were experiencing symptoms which gave us a basis for understanding and putting up a fight against false claims. The large majority of the population has little to no foundational knowledge from which to draw when it comes to matters of technology. This places us in a far more vulnerable position than any of us were in with COVID. In matters of space and cyberspace it is critical that we have not only a better understanding of what we don’t know but also an accounting of those that hold the knowledge.
First of all, let me state something very clearly. I AM NOT HERE TO TALK ABOUT UFOs!!! An earnest discussion on the viability of their existence is not the road I am going down at all….that is for another day.
Prior to leaving office Donald Trump played a very interesting card when it comes to UFO disclosure. As part of a COVID relief bill of all things, he planted a section that put the CIA on a timeline. He gave them 180 days to provide documents regarding unidentified flying objects. This is the type of timing that forces the hand of your enemy long after you have left office. He could have easily put something in the bill that mandated they be released before he left office, but he did not. It is the type of timing that appears to be sending a message….to us. A message that says, “they’re up to something, now get with the program and call their bluff.”
I am sure there are some people thinking are you implying a UFO false flag? You may even be thinking I need to step back and take a few deep breaths.
But, by shoving a ‘handover the UFO documentation within 180 days’ clause into a $2.3 trillion dollar COVID relief bill Trump was telling us and them something. He was telling them you can start in January if you want but you better finish by July. But what was he telling us? Maybe he was telling us to watch the skies? Was he telling us to watch for something real? Or fake?
The report requirement said it must address “observed airborne objects that have not been identified” and should include a “detailed analysis of unidentified phenomena data collected by:
a. geospatial intelligence
b. signals intelligence
c. human intelligence
d. measurement and signals intelligence
The report must also contain “detailed analysis of data of the FBI… and an assessment of whether this unidentified aerial phenomenon activity may be connected to a foreign adversary.
Was he covertly forcing them to give us their playbook?
Do you remember this guy? He is Lue Elizondo.
He is the former head of the Pentagon’s UFO investigation. Actually, it’s called the UAP program….Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. This was the story of the U.S. government's begrudging acknowledgment. After decades of public denial, the Pentagon now admits there's something out there, and the U.S. Senate wants to know what it is. Bill Whitaker of 60 Minutes asks Elizondo “So, what you are telling me is that UFOs, unidentified flying objects, are real?
"Bill, I think we're beyond that already. The government has already stated for the record that they're real. I'm not telling you that. The United States government is telling you that.”
But that is kind of old news compared to what is taking place now…
Apparently former CIA Directors, CIA spies, and those serving in clandestine services for 25+ years are now the targets of aliens. Who would have ever thought these aliens would be keen enough to zone in on our intelligence community? If I were an Alien (and according to John Ramirez I am) this would definitely be my plan; begin abducting CIA agents.
Folks we’re not talking about farmers seeing lights above a field in Nebraska. We’re talking about serious cases that only came about because of the mandate Trump put in place and because of FOIA requests. Later in that same interview John spoke in detail about much of the activity taking place is in the airspace above of all place…you guessed it….RUSSIA. In a separate livestream Lue Elizondo was asked if he could corroborate the story from Ramirez, here was his response.
Even Trump chimed on the video and made more than one curious comment. From the not-so-friendly ‘Intelligencer’.
Again, I am not here to predict or attempt to be prophetic because scripture has already outlined what we might expect ‘as we see the day approaching’. My job is primarily to illustrate the capabilities and in doing so continue to educate myself and others on what might be worthy of investigation. This is a topic that in my mind is very much worthy of investigation. And for those who think “well this is just too much they could never pull this off” then you’re probably suffering from early signs of ‘something’ because the last time I checked they are now at what appears to be the tail end of perhaps the greatest global health fraud ever pushed on humanity and it has been pretty successful by any measure…..OH, and by the way, they used pretty much no technology to accomplish it.
Anyone claiming they cannot be deceived has just deceived themselves because once they turn on the big machines and I can promise you they have not turned on the big machines yet…..it will be game over for the large majority of sitting ducks.
But here is something that everyone needs to understan The United States DOD and military is being completely neutered.
The United States DOD and military is being completely neutered. The amount of Pentagon resignations is mind-blowing. Turnover resulting from transitions of power is one thing, but we are now nearly 15 months into the Biden presidency and it's complete and utter chaos.
So when you hear government officials from Russia say things like ‘the US doesn’t really have a true space program’ yes, take it with a grain of salt….but also keep in mind that it’s no coincidence that things requiring technology at the Pentagon don’t seem to work precisely at the time that you need them most….for example, the phone lines at the IT help desk….or….fully functioning security cameras on the morning of 9/11. This is why when anything of significance needs to happen the government will always enlist the private sector to help provide the IT and infrastructure backbone required to accomplish things they could never do on their own. This is why we see companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Cisco and others playing such key roles in the affairs of government and the people. It’s not that Gates woke up one morning back in 1976 and said, “I think I will design Microsoft DOS right now because on day George Soros and Klaus Schwab will try to take over the world.” He, like Zuckerberg or Bezos or Jaime Daimon (of Chase) were bought off with government money.
Innovation has always come from the private sector and it’s no different in the case of Quantum computing or 5G or Machine Learning or Blockchain technologies. When government money talks these folks tend to do whatever the policy says is needed.
So, when CISA tells you they are implementing new 5G Layering Network Security Through Segmentation what that really means is “we bought off AT&T and Verizon and we plan to not only track you but compel you to do things that prior to now you simply have not been preparing for.”
Oh, and by the way, to make it easy for both you and us please make sure and update your latest phone operating system so we can make sure your phone is able to identify you ‘even if you’re masked’….because after all, masks never had anything to do with a virus.
I was checking out a documentary on that ultra-conservative channel FoxNATION the other night. It was called ‘The Jesus Strand’.
It was pretty fascinating, and it had all the perfect little cinematography tricks.
The premise of the show was to see if they could trace people who exist today back to Jesus. They had what may have been the bones of John the Baptist, the shroud of Turin, and they were using silicon graphics to show a full-motion Ancestry.com type family tree with a blood drop representing the entire biblical lineage.
Wait? A blood drop next to Joseph? Was Joseph the father of Jesus? For that matter, was Mary even the mother of Jesus? She obviously carried him but what about the whole ‘Jesus is the son of God’ or ‘Jesus was uncreated because Jesus existed in the beginning with God’? Was Jesus just another one of the guys? What will you believe about Jesus?
These are not times for the weak-hearted. The tools of the enemy are extraordinarily power so educate yourself because nobody is above falling prey to deception.
When I see the flurry of events, any one of which would be national news under normal circumstances, I equate it to a Mighty Wurlitzer Piano where the pianist knows which level to play on and when, when to adjust the volume and when to dial it back, when to bring up the war drums, and when to soften the music to Moonlight Sonata. There are more peddles, keys, and toggles than one can deal with but somehow the music keeps playing.
But the $64,000 question becomes ‘Who is really playing the piano’?
Well, I have always been of the mindset that Donald Trump has done things that even when the final chapters are written on this era they may never be revealed. A lot of this has to do with his tremendous ability to see and execute the long game and the other his extreme expertise in communication. There are many, many, examples of this, but I am going to isolate on what I believe are 3 critical ones.
Example 1: Donald Trump says after an October, 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton, “I will totally accept the results of this great and historical election, if I win.” Think about that statement for a moment. What could a man that was trailing in average polls leading up to election day anywhere from 4-6 percentage points have to gain by making a statement like that? If you lose you look like a maniac and a sore loser. In the unlikely event that you win it immediately ramps up the election tampering talk. So, without a single thing to gain why did he make that statement? First of all, he made that statement because he had already been looking at the internal polling numbers (probably for both campaigns) and he knew the coming results. Secondly, this comment is what I believe put the enemy into motion for rigging future elections. He forced the enemy to pour gas on their most evil tendency that up to this point had been like taking candy from republican babies. Compare Trump to Al Gore and his statements back in 2000.
Example 2: Donald Trump says in a March 4th, 2017 tweet that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower. The reviews on the end result of this investigation ended up partially vindicating Trump but the more you parse the wording the more you realized it was 100% accurate. It turns out the actual copper analog wires in Paul Manafort’s office in Trump Tower we quite literally tapped. And those orders most certainly came directly from Obama given they were tapping the wires of a sitting presidential nominee. But again? Why make this statement? Well, let’s get one thing straight…anyone that thinks he ‘just found out’ on March 4, 2017 is kidding themselves. This is precisely why he decided to complete the transition of power from his facilities in New York because he knew they would tap the phones, but he also knew his own telecom infrastructure intercept capabilities. He was playing the end….right from the beginning.
And finally, Example 3: “We Caught Them All” statements.
The circled number in red below have already been proven….those in black remain to be proven.
Don’t get me wrong, I am just one man with an opinion, but I think to truly understand what is taking place (especially as it pertains to Trump) we have to try and rid our brains of idea of causality which is this notion that current sets of circumstances are the result of past sets of circumstances. This idea of domino thinking is faulty in my opinion. This is a spiritual battle at its core that transcends these types of pre-conceived ideas. Trump has never struck me as someone that thinks and acts that way….but rather someone that thinks in terms of a single event (i.e….we caught them all). Linear thinking is a dead end street. It makes better sense to think of the two events you may think of as causally related as rather, two parts of the same event. They go with each other but the relationship is not causal….it’s mutual.
The schemes of the enemy are many, but we see those plans unravelling left and right with every passing day.
We take great courage in knowing that when men plan God laughs and we’re even more encouraged to know that what God told the Church at Corinth he is telling us today….
Essentially the biblical equivalent of….
We may be weary but we are still standing! I am in my 60's and have been working at unraveling hidden things and so much more and yet i think i didn't know anything after Q started posting and all you wonderful people came along putting this giant rats nest in perspective! Thank you Sir and God bless you mightily.